DW Forums
SearchMember ListHelp Register
Post Reply 
My Photography (56k = not likely)
Author
Message
Quote this message in a reply
My Photography (56k = not likely)
Thought i'd post some of my '07 work here Smile:

[Image: IMG_1588.jpg]

[Image: IMG_0277.jpg]

[Image: IMG_0792.jpg]

[Image: IMG_1952.jpg]

[Image: asdasdasd-1.jpg]

[Image: wall.jpg]

[Image: IMG_27131.jpg]

[Image: IMG_3393.jpg]

Some photos i've recently munted up in photoshop:

[Image: IMG_2717-1.jpg]
(Click for larger 1280xX wallpaper size)
[Image: IMG_2715-2.jpg]
(Click for larger 1280xX wallpaper size)
[Image: IMG_2710-1.jpg]
(Click for larger 1280xX wallpaper size)
[Image: IMG_2683.jpg]
(Click for larger 1280xX wallpaper size)

Semi-Recent Panoramas:
[Image: 2-1-1.jpg]
(Click for larger size)

[Image: 1321321-1.jpg]
(Click for larger size)

Panorama of the hills surrounding Gisborne: (8295x520)

Hoping I can a few of these for some $$$ D:
Visit this user's website
Quote this message in a reply
 
What the hell is happening with that second water drop photo!?

is it even a water drop?

Im not a fan of the toy car pics, but that first water splash is amazing
Quote this message in a reply
 
good work Timo

[Image: sig.jpg]
Visit this user's website
Quote this message in a reply
 
Pro as always; What camera are you using?
Quote this message in a reply
 
Jeez the gosu first water drop pic you should try and $_$ with it really.
Quote this message in a reply
 
I have a friend that does alot of photos and drawings as part of his architecture degree, and i think he prints them onto canvas or does some photoshop effects and then sells them at $100 a pop.

The trick is to get them printed or a frame fitted to one from a gallery, making sure they get a good look at it... ^_^
Quote this message in a reply
 
[Image: ozsoa.gif]

Silvio Berlusconi, March 26, 2009: "I'm paler [than Mr Obama], because it's been so long since I went sunbathing. He's more handsome, younger and taller"
Quote this message in a reply
 
Thanks for the comments guys!

P4 Wrote:What the hell is happening with that second water drop photo!?

I think a drop of water collided with the splash of another that just started to come up, or something :x
dw Wrote:Pro as always; What camera are you using?
April this year I finally saved up enough money from working at pak n slave to afford one of these (but silver):
[Image: 0142_canon_400d_eos.jpg]

^_^ Worth every penny.
P4 Wrote:I have a friend that does alot of photos and drawings as part of his architecture degree, and i think he prints them onto canvas or does some photoshop effects and then sells them at $100 a pop.

The trick is to get them printed or a frame fitted to one from a gallery, making sure they get a good look at it... ^_^

I'm hoping I can get some wall space in a cafe in town, where I can sell some A3 or canvased images. Although I'll need to get a job to be able to afford to pay for them in the first place >_>
Visit this user's website
Quote this message in a reply
 
Good work bro, nice stuff
Quote this message in a reply
 
Zane asked me to do a 1 hour exposure at school today, so I figured i'd give it a go. I did a few test shots to focus, then left it on for 15 minutes to check if I had found the south celestial pole (top left of image below). Well I had but from it I figured there was no point shooting for an hour, as it'd be too bright, and it just wouldn't look nice with all the light pollution in the city interfering.

I might try going up the coast to Wainui, out to Gray's bush, or even just up Riverside Road for a while this weekend to see if I can get a longer exposure with less light from town. Be able to set up a nice scene too, with the hills in the background or something (without the tree, the shot would be pretty bland).

But man, what a difference shooting in .RAW format makes. It means the camera does no post processing itself (setting sharpness/brightness/saturation/white balance/etc), and lets me tinker around afterwards. The only downside to .RAW is that each shot is around 10mb, meaning I can take only a fifth of what I could with jpeg alone (But I can still shoot 500 RAW images, thanks to a 4GB and 1GB stick :3).
[Image: stars.jpg]
943 seconds (15 minutes 43 seconds), f/3.5, ISO 100. Added a bit of blur to an over layed duplicate to make the tree a bit softer, since it was windy.
Visit this user's website
Post Reply