- ⢠1GHz processor (32- or 64-bit)
⢠1GB of RAM
⢠16 GB of available disk space
⢠Support for DirectX 9 graphics with 128MB of memory (for the Aero interface)
- ⢠1 GHz processor (32- or 64-bit)
⢠1 GB of RAM (32-bit); 2 GB of RAM (64-bit)
⢠16 GB of available disk space (32-bit); 20 GB of avaiable disk space (64-bit)
⢠DirectX 9 graphics device with WDDM 1.0 or higher driver
System requirements for Windows Vista:
- ⢠1 GHz processor (32- or 64-bit)
⢠512 MB of RAM (for Home Basic); 1 GB of RAM for all other versions
⢠15 GB of available disk space
⢠Support for DirectX 9 graphics and 32 MB of graphics memory (for Home Basic); 128 MB of graphics memory plus WDDM support for all other versions
Source: Neowin.net
[1] Source: ZDNet
â¢------------------------â¢
The only thing that's noticably different (between Vista and Win7) is the two-fold increase in RAM required. The fact that Vista's requirements are considered too low in this area, could this be because Microsoft expects users to depend heavily upon virtualization software for compatibility within Windows 7?
That said, however, I've heard plenty of reports that the performance isn't bad at all on some systems with only 512MB RAM. In that case, it looks like Microsoft is overstating the requirements in order to compensate for other components where the architecture or other software contributes to performance losses (Low cache, cheap CPUs, slow disk drives, Zone Alarm, etc.).










![[Image: wsd.png]](http://www.webstuffdone.com/images/wsd.png)
